Talk:Medium term note
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg[edit]
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Some info here is bogus[edit]
Some of the info here seems bogus. There was some spamming in this article related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lifnlsdlsdnf. The explicit spam has been removed, but the article is still bad. Compare [1], which talks about SEC Rule 415, shelf registrations, and how GMAC used them. That's not a reliable source in Wikipedia terms, but it makes sense. (I realize that General Motors isn't exactly a good example of financial management this week, but they're way ahead of the spammer.) --John Nagle (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- This Federal Reserve Bulletin article [2] might be a good source. --John Nagle (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Undid copyvio[edit]
Just undid these edits [3] because they were copied from [4]. --John Nagle (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Adding info then[edit]
Nagle: How about you actually doing some work in improving this article instead of blocking developments...! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.173.163.2 (talk • contribs)