Talk:Mega Man 3/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul (talk · contribs) 15:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article in the near future, most likely tomorrow. Canadian Paul 15:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A very nice article, my only concern is that the second paragraph under Development doesn't flow very well; it's a bit choppy and jumps from fact to fact, making it difficult to read/follow. Is there anything that can be done to improve that?
Other than that, this article is more than ready for GA status. I'll be checking this page at least daily, unless something comes up, so you can be sure I'll notice any comments left here. Canadian Paul 16:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)