Talk:Megalocnus
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Picture Problem
[edit]Would it be possible if someone could have the courtesy to explain exactly what's wrong with the reconstructions beyond giving the extraordinarily vague adjective of "amateurish," so I can attempt to improve my pictures before they are removed from the article?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Dont listen to full blown, money-heavy professional guys when talking about image quality. They only see how good theirs is and not how good yours is to the people here. --User:piatnitskysaurus (talk)sun 3rd of August(UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class mammal articles
- Low-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- Stub-Class Extinction articles
- Low-importance Extinction articles
- WikiProject Extinction articles