Jump to content

Talk:Mendy Rudolph/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
Prose is far from excellent, probably only a 5/10 in places. Nevertheless, I think it is good enough for GA.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
This qualifies comfortably but I would be interested in more information about his gambling addiction and the effects on him and his family.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail: