The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Move all. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Most of these go against the typical Wikipedia convention to disambiguate articles by using parentheses after the article name, and discussion on WikiProject Astronomical objects has come to the view that the format should be Messier #. Many of the destination pages are redirects with more than one item in the history. Chaos syndrome 20:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I feel the image for M-35 is not a good presentation of this object. NASA's 2MASS is an infrared survey, and therefore is not sensitive to the blue stars that constitute a majority of stars in M-35. The much more distant cluster NGC2158 shows up nicely, but not M-35. I have not searched for a better image in the public domain, but there must be something better. --Iverp (talk) 03:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)