Talk:Meta-emotion

Meta-emotion was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2012). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Mind Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind

Prehistory

The explanation of one of the cells in the Becker section is missing. DCDuring 15:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark this article as "need expansion?"

I dont know all the codes for an article, but I think this article needs the note that some newly created or poor written articles has. Not sure what that note says, but it something with "Expansion needed, please help". Please re-write this discission section too for me :p, it's poorly written. Sorry, im not that good with editing wiki articles, but I will learn how to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.74.141 (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to article

I hope that the additions I have made to this article show a marked improvement from what previously existed. I have added much more information and seventeen references to better explain the concept of meta-emotion, particularly parental meta-emotion philosophy. I will continue to work on improving this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acal26 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Just a side note, it may be beneficial to try and add some more sources in your article, especially in the introduction section. Vmansoor (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other uses of the concept.

This article is mistitled: the contents are limited to parenting meta-emotions. The notion is much broader than that--e.g. schadenfreude has been widely cited as a metaemotion. Please either change the title or broaden the discussion. Burressd (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]