Talk:Metaxy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead Text[edit]

I think the lead text to this article should have a less academic, rather more colloquial, tone. Connecting the concept to Diotima trough Socrates, should give more emphasis on Diotima view of platonic love, or the 'philosophy of love', as Socrates called it, as a way to reach a higher state of knowledge to overcome the limitations of language as a medium to understand reality without prejudice. See Wikipedia article on Diotime role in Symposium by Plato to a clear view of this.--Wcris (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metaxy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voegelin?[edit]

This article contained some very... unusual prose about oral traditions that it claimed were in Plato's Symposium. This apears to have been a non-obvious interpretation, so I have removed it, as it was uncited. Possibly from Eric Voegelin?

This does seem to be a case where an ancient Greek word that held little significance philosophically is interpreted in a different way by a contemporary philosopher, so I've restructured the article based on that assumption. - car chasm (talk) 05:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]