Talk:Milton Blockhouse

Milton Blockhouse has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 31, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Milton Blockhouse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one, probably over the w/e. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox check

Two dabs: pike and porter.
No EL issues reported.

Prose/content/structure

Let me know if my copyedit changed any meaning.
I notice "Device plan" links to Device Forts, which is fine, just want to check if "plan" should be capitalised.
Level of detail seems fine for this subject -- poor old fort didn't have much of a career, did it?!

Referencing

Fully cited and sources look reliable.
Formatting generally seems fine although I think you're using hyphens for page ranges and I believe MOS still favours short dashes.

Images

Appropriately licensed/captions.
File:Gravesend defences 1588 Thamesis Descriptio.png doesn't have alt text, although admittedly it's not a requirement.

Look forward to seeing you apply your talents to more articles on Henry's device forts, especially Deal! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changes should be done now; I think that Device plan is probably OK... Deal is definitely on the list! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great -- passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey the same can be said for the whole series of Device Fort articles! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great little article, and very well deserving of its new status. Well done! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fortuna! Hchc2009 (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]