Talk:Mobile PCI Express Module

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Removed claim that Apple is the first manufacturer to use MXM in a desktop since Shuttle use it in their X100 and that model has been available for quite a few months.

Please sign your posts.--Eddie 23:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Images would sure be nice.--Eddie 23:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Failure[edit]

Nvidia just sell the chips for the MXM modules. The goal of MXM was not achieved because most of the main notebook manufactures uses a proprietary MXM standard. Nvidia wanted to make notebooks so upgradable as desktop computers. Notebook manufacturers would have to produce MXM graphic cards that would fit in any MXM slot. Although this is not the reality. Notebooks manufacturers would lose many millions of euros doing that because to upgrade a notebook the consumer would just have to replace the components and wouldn't buy a new notebook. This is so true that some manufacturers have their MXM modules soldered to the notebook motherboard. Even with the mxm non-proprietary slot the upgradability is never assured. If you consult the MXM page at Nvidia website they say MXM it's an upgradable standard. It's not. No one can go to a shop or order in the internet an mxm module to replace the notebook graphic card. There are some very few and very rare cases where this is possible and some does not use MXM non-proprietary slot. If you buy a notebook with a MXM symbol and you cannot replace the MXM module you can make a legal issue with the seller of that notebook.

MXM 2.0[edit]

There are some rumours about mxm 2.0 Some manufactures that doesn't use mxm complains about some mechanical issues of mxm but it can be just an excuse to not use non proprietary mxm. This must be because the pci-express 2.0 is coming out but no one knowns certainly if there is going to be a mxm 2.0. —Preceding unsigned comment added by - - - (talk • contribs) 15:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MXM-IV[edit]

Could we have some clarification on this please. The format is being used in some 8800s i think. Is this aka MXM-HE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.90.102 (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HP Firebird with VoodooDNA Models 802 and 803[edit]

HP Firebird with VoodooDNA Models 802 and 803 uses MXM cards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.208.135 (talk) 19:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mobile PCI Express Module. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081112061442/http://www.mxm-sig.org/ to http://www.mxm-sig.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

VIA QSM-8Q90 Module - Module Angle (6856346650).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

VIA QSM-8Q90 Module - Module Angle (6856346650).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missing GPUs[edit]

There are lots of missing GPUs on the list, especially the recent ones from Intel 77.75.244.149 (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Pins[edit]

There are MXM3.0 connectors with 314pins. Why aren't these listed? [1]https://www.jae.com/en/technical/pim/detail/id=840 81.144.152.54 (talk) 08:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]