Talk:Molybdenum/GA1
This article deserves GA status. It is well written, neutral, stable and well referenced with in-line citations. A few minor problems had been fixed during the review, as documented below. Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Please check the dead links here and "citation needed" tags.
Clarify "free oxygen" (gas, atoms, else ?)
Clarify "alkaline water"
"reached a peak of $103,000 per tonne in June 2005" - why?
Is it true that oxidation state zero is among the most stable ones ? How about 2+ (sulfides) ? This refers to bolding some values in the oxidation state table.
- I changed some {{chem templates into usual <sub, <sup because the formulas get split up at line break. Materialscientist (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is just a hint that the info on number of Mo enzymes is obsolete in the article. Could you update that? Materialscientist (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.03.013 gives 50 by 2002, so lets take that number. But I will try to get latest number.--Stone (talk) 14:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I found no newer numbers. I put the numbers in from the journal mentioned above--Stone (talk) 03:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- I failed too - new articles simply re-cite old reviews. A specialist is needed here. Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I found no newer numbers. I put the numbers in from the journal mentioned above--Stone (talk) 03:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)