Talk:Moongarden

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Simply refer to the citations for notability. This is a significant progrock band, listed in GEPR, 3 albums, aclaimed, commercial success, available on Amazon [1], rave reviews. Not a "nobody band." WHY would anybody flag it for deletion? Please explain. Meets all criteria for wikipedia inclusion. PLEASE LOOK BEFORE YOU DELETE. Started as a stub (I just couldn't believe no article already existed), hoping for contributions from other authors. Gekritzl 01:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I tagged it, the only reference was a few lines in an 'Encyclopedia of Gibraltan Music', or similar... I don't really think that is enough, although it's up to an administrator to decide. Of the other three references added, one was a link to a torrent site (which I removed), one was just a list of bands that a fan had seen live, and one was the CD for sale on CD-Baby (not nessecarily an indication of notability). --Darksun 01:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - to correct you, it's not the "Encyclopedia of Gibraltan Music" -- I guess "Gibraltan Music" would be very obscure music from Gibraltar -- maybe that was where you misunderstood. :) It's the Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Progressive Music, which has been around for over a decade, collecting information, history, and reviews of progrock bands and music. You might want to remove your flag for speedy deletion. Check the citations. Thanks! Gekritzl 01:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, last night I suppose I was a bit tired and stressed, I had seen this article had already been speedied once under A7 and didn't see much difference. I removed the tag, but I still question whether or not this group meets notability guidelines. --Darksun 07:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to Porcupine Tree and Theatre

I tagged this as needing citation as I can't find out WHO has compared Moongarden to these other bands. Unless it was done in a reliable, independant source it would qualify as original research or personal opinion. --Darksun 22:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Moongarden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]