Talk:Moral diplomacy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

what were the problems with Moral Diplomacy? it sucks!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.106.31.21 (talk) 23:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that wasn't helpful, neither is the article. It looks like the answer to a 9th-grade history class worksheet. Speedy delete until something more wiki-suitable comes around? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.62.51 (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this needs fixing!

First I tagged it, then I tried to have it speedy deleted, then I stripped out the worst of its rubbish and repetition. Now someone else can have a go. --Greenmaven (talk) 10:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moral diplomacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130710200154/http://www.justice4darfur.org/moral-diplomacy.html to http://www.justice4darfur.org/moral-diplomacy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last paragraph

I suggest altering the last paragraph. The last sentence is incorrect; Huerta resigned the presidency on July 15, 1914, but Wilson did not extend de facto recognition to Carranza until October 19, 1915, which is definitely not "immediately." U.S. presidential terms ended on March 4 until the 20th amendment changed that to January 20, which is why Taft is involved here.

Wilson had international problems, particularly in Mexico. Mexico had seen a series of revolutions since 1910. Americans with mining and other interests in Mexico at times wanted U.S. intervention to protect their interests. When Victoriano Huerta deposed Francisco I. Madero and assumed the Mexican presidency on February 20, 1913, President Taft did not recognize his government, but would have done so if Huerta had acceded to demands for protection of American interests previously made to President Madero in a telegram of September 15, 1912.[1] President Wilson refused to recognize Huerta because he had illegally seized power and refused proposals for free elections. [2] Other countries supported Huerta mainly due to his open policies toward foreign investment.[3] In April 1914, Mexican officials in Tampico arrested a few American sailors who blundered into a prohibited area, and Wilson used the incident to justify ordering the U.S. Navy to occupy the port city of Veracruz. [4] The move greatly weakened Huerta's control, and he resigned on July 15, 1914. [5] Civil war ensued, ending with victories by the Constitutionalists and President Wilson's the de facto recognition of Carranza on October 19, 1915. [6]

1. Haley, P. Edward. Revolution and Intervention: The Diplomacy of Taft and Wilson with Mexico, 1910-1917. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1970

2. Link, Arthur S. Wilson: The New Freedom. Princeton: The Princeton University Press, 1956

3.

4. United States occupation of Veracruz - Wikipedia

5. "Huerta's Final Message to the Mexican Congress". The Independent. July 27, 1914. Retrieved 24 July 2012.

6. The Relationship between Wilson and Carranza [1]https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1773&context=luc_theses TwoGunChuck (talk) 22:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]