Jump to content

Talk:Motorola APCOR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Augggh - my back!!

[edit]

Advanced Portable Coronary Observation Radio is, to the best of my knowledge, the correct name, those of us that lugged them up too many flights of stairs know that APCOR actually stood for Allegedly Portable Coronary Observation Radio. Damn things were heavy! Note: This information, while notable at the time, has no place in the actual article. --plaws (talk) 22:20, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This might actually be notable: there were at least three models I ever heard of. The two heavy ones were the 12 and 15 W output models. But then there was a 1 W model as well that was MUCH lighter because of the MUCH smaller battery. It ran through a vehicle mounted repeater but still full-duplex UHF. Some of these, maybe all, had a small DTMF keypad that allowed the paramedics to "steer" the vehicle repeater to a different channel. It may be the case that the non-steerable versions were stuck on whatever channel the vehicular repeater was tuned to. --plaws (talk) 16:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Motorola APCOR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]