Talk:Mount Bachelor/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 11:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   I'd clarify in the lead that it is considered a "moderate" threat level by the United States Geological Survey.

   Tephra and Pyroclastic rock are wikilinked, though not at their first instances

   You mention 'Volcanic bomb' once and then 'lava bomb' later. Is there any difference between the two? I note that 'Lava bomb' just redirects to Volcanic bomb

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Looking forward to passing this once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Freikorp, thanks very much for the review! I think I addressed your comments. ceranthor 15:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Great work. Passing. :) Freikorp (talk) 23:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.