Talk:Movement for European Reform/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Movement for European Reform. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Ideology
I've noticed an edit war between two users on here and I think we need to be careful what we list as the ideology of the grouping. Just because the two parties currently involved share certain extra ideologies does not mean that is the ideology of the grouping.
I have looked at their website and I think the current listings can all be clearly sourced.
Economic Liberalism: "[We] share a commitment to open markets." Euroscepticism: "...a Europe of nation states" Atlanticism: "...and the importance of the Atlantic relationship."
I think that's all pretty uncontested. The two argued over are:
Enviromentalism: The wikipedia article states "Environmentalism is a concern for the preservation, restoration, or improvement of the natural environment." The main page of the MER website states: "a flexible, outward-looking EU should focus on new priorities such as: ...Climate change, energy & the environment." I think this means the MER qualifies as environmentalist as they don't just "believe in global warming" - they think dealing with these issues should be one of three main priorities of the EU.
Conservatism: Tom says "Conservatism, inasmuch as the British Conservative Party and ODS define it, includes economic liberalism." Perhaps, but this will not be clear to readers unfamiliar with the various definitions of conservatism - in some contexts conservatism is actually against reducing trade barriers (thus US Republicans committing themselves to farm subsidies in Iowa at the moment). Also, there are other, more important, aspects of Conservatism not espoused by the MER - religion, "family values", protecting historic instutions, maintaining traditional culture etc. Thus it makes sense just to reference the specific belief of the MER: economic liberalism.
198.49.174.82 17:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Source
- Script of a 1996 8-minute EURINFO concerning the debate on whether to leave EPP-ED. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
New Group
Should this page now be moved to something like European Conservatives and Reformists Group as this appears to be the name of the new bloc [1], at the very least we will need a page there! --Neil (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Movement for European Reform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515183932/http://www.europeanreform.eu/ to http://www.europeanreform.eu/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515183932/http://www.europeanreform.eu/ to http://www.europeanreform.eu/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.conservatives.com/pdf/MovementforEuropeanReform.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060717192119/http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=news.story.page&obj_id=130928&speeches=1 to http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=news.story.page&obj_id=130928&speeches=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)