Talk:Multi-bearer network

Copyright issue review

The material in the quote comes from a page which claims copyright, However, per discussion at:

User_talk:Moonriddengirl/Archive_48#Copyright_status_of_material_on_Google_patent_pages

it appears that the text of a patent is not subject to copyright. The section may still be confusing, so I left that template. The material was orriginally added by an editor who hasn't edited since adding this in 2009.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 18:56, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible Techno Jargon

Using the patent text as a description is totally pointless as it is made mostly of technological jargon (that is in turn only well defined in the patent context). Please expand and rewrite in a form that normal people can understand. Jahibadkaret (talk) 15:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Multi-bearer network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]