Talk:My Prerogative/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 08:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- All references appear to be in order.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article covers major aspects and remains focused on its subject.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article complies to WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article appears to be stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images comply with fair use rationales and are properly captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- Wikilinks should only be made on the first mention. Remove repeated links.
- Wikilinks should only be made if they are relevant to the context. Common words do not need wikilinking.
- I don't know which links you are referring to in both cases. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- These are very minor, for example, "Hollywood Hills", "Rolling Stone" and "Madison Square Garden" only need to be wikified on first mention. As they are minor, I have fixed them for you. -- S Masters (talk) 04:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- On the February 4, 1989 show at Madison Square Garden in New York City, wore a red boxing robe with the words "King of the Stage" printed in the back. - Missing a pronoun.
- Is it possible to include a clip of the song?
- I'll see if i can find one. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Added for the two versions. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'll see if i can find one. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Summary: This article does not have major issues, except for what I have mentioned above. I will allow up to seven days for these to be fixed.
Final summary: Thank you for your hard work in making this a better article. I am now satisfied that the article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and am happy to pass it for GA status. -- S Masters (talk) 04:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)