I feel that this section should be merged into the intro and the morphology section. There are a few problems:
it only includes one stage of the parasite, which may confuse readers
it's not really a "definition," it's mostly about morphology, so I think it should go there.
I don't want to delete a section without your approval, though. Let me know what you think. Dave(talk) 23:51, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
That's fine with me, I was following the stucture of a paper I was reading, but it makes more sense the way you suggested. I'll do it now. Don't worry about my approval. I'm a very relaxed guy and I'm pretty sure you're not going to do anything evil to the Myxosporea... ;) Anilocra 16:07, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
The section added in the version of "21:24, 10 May 2005 UTC" by Anilocra, seems to be a copy of certain paragraph from a paper (indicated below). The paper has a virtually same paragraph in the Indroduction section, with minor differences. I'm not sure this is a case of copyright infringement, but I'll note.
Ahmet Ö ZER (2001). "Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) Observations on Some Members of Actinosporean (Phylum Myxozoa) Collective Groups and Possible Usage of SEM in Type Description". Turkish Journal of Zoology. 25 (4): 413–419. C1 control character in |author= at position 8 (help)PDF available