Talk:Nadavara
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Nadavara
[edit]The article is creating a new name, Nador for the nadavara community of Uttara Kannada. There is no community called Nador. Nadava and Nadavara are two different castes. Nadavas are from Udupi and Dakshina Kannada districts and Nadavaras are from Uttara Kannada district. In the records of 1765 created during the regime of Haider Ali, the earliest settlers of Hiregutti, Uttara Kannada were mentioned as Jain Nadavara. Sir Thomas Munro, the Governor of Madras who in his early days in India served as the Collector of Canara (1800), in his papers mentioned about the Nadavaras of northern Canara (North Kanara district). Nadavara of North Kanara were mentioned by the Gadzetteer of Bombay presidency and the records of Bombay State. Don't try to create your own things incorrectly and try to introduce in wiki articles. Mr. Linguistic Geek, please check the official names of castes. You can find numerous historical references.2601:18A:C301:FDD1:2484:E001:8432:D38D (talk) 16:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Sikanjal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sikanjal (talk • contribs) 16:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
This page was cleaned up and has been properly sourced with citations. You are advised to not include original research in any wikipedia article.Linguisticgeek (talk) i am very much specific about one more fact about uttar kannada nadavar that is as mentioned in historical fact"uppunadavar and torke nadavar are two endogamouse groups of nadavar"otherwise fact has no significance because people from other caste cal both groups of nadavar as nadavar but both these group treat themselves as seperate caste which is far from fact.All the people from both groups are now educated if one think properly it will be quite clear that base of all group of nadavar is same and it is very high time to have united nadavar forum .creating more and more gap between the group is not at all good significance of civilised people.why i am worring about this matter? because any book or article on nadavar is not at all mentioning groups of nadavar .why ?particularly uppunadavar group of vannalli and kadle they call themselves as nadavar.they never mention their caste as uppunadavar.that should be the strong ideolgy of that community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.43.72 (talk) 10:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)