Talk:Nano-RAM

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Nantero was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 July 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nano-RAM. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Request Edit Assistance

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

The information in this article is out of date, and I would like to provide updated information. I work for Nantero, and want to avoid conflict of interest. Would it be possible for me to provide technically accurate information to an editor who can help with neutrality and other Wikipedia standards? Nto-joe (talk) 15:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You may use Request Edit to propose specific edits and if they are neutral, properly sourced and an obvious improvement to the article, they will be added. CorporateM (Talk) 16:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what unit

What unit is being referred to in "N-RAM can hold up to 200 gigabytes per square unit"? This statement seems meaningless unless the unit is specified (e.g., centimeter).

I was pretty curious about this as well, I found this Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 13, 2003 2:55:00 PM The first 10GB nanotechnology memory (NRAM) device has been built in the laboratories of Nantero, the Boston, Massachussetts company has said. ... I'm guessing it's 200 gigabytes per square cm, since that seems to be the measurement used for other types of memory (hard disks at least)

Jwilsbacher (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a dead/uninteresting product?

The promises of the NRAM are too great that it can replace all existing standards of memory storage. However, I believe that the company is not willing to make this commercially available anytime soon (and I doubt that they will make this commercially available; I presume this product will never be available for the ordinary people). They did not even set a release date nor partnered with Motherboard/Processor manufacturers for compliance with the new memory. No major computer-related company have invested heavily to keep this project going. I believe that the company is having problems that hinders the development of this new type of product (Patent issues, American Financial Crisis, Inhumane Royalty Fees, Prototypes not ready for mainstream usage, Staff issues which includes lack of people who are expert in/knowledge of carbon as a semiconductor, Manufacturers of Hard Disks, Flash Memory, and DRAM paying to intentionally hinder/sabotage/make the product unavailable to the market, inability to mass-produce the product as efficient as Hard Disks, Flash Memory, and DRAMs). If this is truly an interesting product with the intention of putting this on the market, they should at least put updates about the development of their product and make their move in creating the world's first commercially available memory to use NRAM Triadwarfare (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nano-RAM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427022729/http://www.crocus-technology.com/pdf/BH%20GSA%20Article.pdf to http://www.crocus-technology.com/pdf/BH%20GSA%20Article.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]