Talk:Neighborhood Watch (White Collar)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Wikilink "Third season" in the lead

   Sources aren't need in the lead. I'd move [4] down to the "Ratings" section

   I would break up the production section into two paragraphs, right before ""Neighborhood Watch" was written by Jeff F. King, his first writing credit..."

   Do you have a citation to state who directed what? Maybe just cite the episode itself

   Italicize The A.V. Club in Ref. No. 4

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The picture in the infobox needs a better caption/rationale

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

On hold for seven days to straighten out the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)