Talk:Neolecta

Illustration

It is just as well that the latest photo was removed, as it was the wrong fungus. It was Microglossum not Neolecta.Heliocybe 12:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error

I think there is something wrong in the Scientific classification. In the class, order, family, genus of this organism, they all linked to this article. It doesn't make sense. Each of them suppose to has their own article. They are related but not exactly the same. Someone should fix this.Trongphu (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Neolecta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]