Talk:Nero in the arts and popular culture

The Lemony Snicket and Buffy references appear twice. 129.237.90.54 00:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Literature and film/TV adaptations, "History Boooooks Nero's life, times and death are chronicled in [[Richard Holland's] book of the same name NERO The Man Behind The Myth", is not well formatted. Nancy.Gallant 04:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Large Portions of this are Dubious

I can't help thinking that huge chunks of this article assume that the word "Nero" appearing anywhere must refer to Emperor Nero without any sourcing, which I imagine qualifies as original research even ignoring the fact it's really dubious. I'd suggest removing all examples where the reference is in doubt, and have removed examples where it's verifiable that "Nero" is just used as the Italian for "Black". Vegetablelove (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t see any relation between Spartacus and Nero (with a distance of much more than a century). Is it enough for a film to be in costumes of ancient Rome to be “related” to Nero? Dominique Meeùs (talk) 22:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Large swaths of this article are going to vanish in one week

As noted in the header, a sizable portion of this article is going to be trimmed away unless reliably-sourced primary references begin appearing in this article. At this writing, there are only six, which means, in eight days, they might be the only bits of Nero's appearance in pop culture that remain in the article. If you have a vested interest in this article, I'd urge you to get cracking. The clock is ticking. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nero in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021030549/http://www.itreviews.co.uk/software/s69.htm to http://www.itreviews.co.uk/software/s69.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]