Jump to content

Talk:New History Warfare Vol. 3: To See More Light/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    Clear, no copyvios or close paraphrasing, no errors.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Follows MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    Well-formatted reference section.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
    Plenty of citations to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    All content is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects covered, uses summary style.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Focused on subject, no extraneous detail.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral presentation, opinions are attributed to sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Highly stable, no instances of disruptive editing since this article was created.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    The album cover is used within fair use policy, and has appropriate rationale.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    The album cover is essential to the article, and is used appropriately.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall: Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass or Fail:
    Note: The nominator told me that they will be without internet access for a bit and can't respond to comments, so I am taking my time at reviewing this article.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]