Talk:news.admin.net-abuse.email

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removed the Kooks Section

Contrary to my mis-spelt edit summary [1], I removed the Kooks section because it was blatantly *POV* not NPOV, as well as being unsourced. Listing real life people in an online encyclopedia as "kooks", which IMO is entirely subjective, is just begging for problems both legal and otherwise. This is different from the "kook awards" of the AUK article in that it's NPOV to state that a group "awarded" somebody with the title "kook of the month", but very much POV to state that a person IS a kook. Nortelrye 20:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, OK

I didn't add the "Kooks" section but what I recall of it didn't strike me as being erroneous or unfair. But if there were the possibility of legal problems I'd be just as happy with leaving the section but changing the designation from "kooks" to something legally sustainable. Maybe "non-productive irritants" would be a possibility.

But I'm just blathering - I have no interest in doing that actual work, simple though it might be. Minasbeede 18:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

where has the NANAE faq gone?!

for around 2 weeks already, the nanae faq link is broken --- leading to a parked domain page full of advertisement. Where is the most recent FAQ now? 89.138.136.59 08:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify

The section "NANAEisms" seems to really need wikifying. I'll try my best to fix it, but I have absolutely no knowledge of the subject matter, so someone may have to clean up after me. Ninety ^wazup? ( r t ) ^{sign here!}

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on News.admin.net-abuse.email. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060806113231/http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/ip/freenet/subs/complaints/spam/jargon.txt to http://www.ncf.carleton.ca./ip/freenet/subs/complaints/spam/jargon.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on News.admin.net-abuse.email. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040212175535/http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml to http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]