Talk:Nicholas Hare Architects
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --
It is factual information. Please take a look at this entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feilden_Clegg_Bradley_Studios and tell me how it is different?
Many thanks Baggie08 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Baggie08
I relisted this for speedy deletion, but it seems no-one answered the objection to the last one. Frankly, that article is itself quite poor (like this one, it's mostly a list of projects/awards with conspicuous bias). It does at least have citations for most of its claims, has more information that can't be construed as promotional, and has attracted interest from multiple, non-single-issue editors. FLHerne (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)