Talk:No Age/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- The lead seems very short and it would be best to summarize the entire article, per here.
Worked on lead..User:EnjoiNico In the Formation, EPs, and Weirdo Rippers section, spell out "LA". In the Sub Pop, Touring, and Nouns section, this sentence ---> "No On May 6th, 2008, No Age released their debut record for Sub Pop, Nouns", something is very wrong with it. In the Nouns Videos Through Current section, "The music video for No Age's song "Eraser" debuted on June 27 on Pete Wentz' friday night show on MTV", I think Pete Went'z show has a name and it would be best to add the shows name, then just adding "his friday night show".
All done. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 03:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- The lead seems very short and it would be best to summarize the entire article, per here.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Dates need to be un-linked, per here. In the Formation, EPs, and Weirdo Rippers section, it would be best if "EP", "singles", and "Weirdo Rippers", were linked once, per here. Same section, italicize "Flaunt", "New Yorker", and "Weirdo Ripper", per here. Same section, the link to "label" needs to be corrected. In the Sub Pop, Touring, and Nouns section, link "Liars", "Pitchfork Media", and "Sub Pop" just once. Same section, italicize "Nouns" and "Mojo" and fix "May 6th, 2008" to ---> "May 6, 2008". In the Nouns Videos Through Current section, fix the link to "St. Vincent". Same section, italicize "Nouns" and "Dead Plane".
All done. Yay! One more thing to go! BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 03:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Dates need to be un-linked, per here. In the Formation, EPs, and Weirdo Rippers section, it would be best if "EP", "singles", and "Weirdo Rippers", were linked once, per here. Same section, italicize "Flaunt", "New Yorker", and "Weirdo Ripper", per here. Same section, the link to "label" needs to be corrected. In the Sub Pop, Touring, and Nouns section, link "Liars", "Pitchfork Media", and "Sub Pop" just once. Same section, italicize "Nouns" and "Mojo" and fix "May 6th, 2008" to ---> "May 6, 2008". In the Nouns Videos Through Current section, fix the link to "St. Vincent". Same section, italicize "Nouns" and "Dead Plane".
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- It would be best if the references use the {{cite web}} format. Reference 4 needs to be fixed. References 4, 9, 11, 13, 21, 23, 24, 26, and 27 are missing Publisher info.
Done! BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 00:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 07:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- It would be best if the references use the {{cite web}} format. Reference 4 needs to be fixed. References 4, 9, 11, 13, 21, 23, 24, 26, and 27 are missing Publisher info.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Image:NoAgeEraserVideo.jpg is missing info. in the FUR.
All done. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 03:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:NoAgeEraserVideo.jpg is missing info. in the FUR.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to Bob for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 07:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)