Talk:Nokia Lumia 900

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Nokia-lumia-900-for-att-white-combo 1600x1000.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Nokia-lumia-900-for-att-white-combo 1600x1000.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nokia-lumia-900-for-att-white-combo 1600x1000.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

So the no permission situation with the original (that was so large that the upload. server could not generate smaller images) has also been confirmed.
I've looked around in Flickr and Picasaweb, and right now there seem to be no images that can be commercially used (as one important criterion for having the file on Wikimedia Commons). I guess it appears, then, that no Commons uploader has not procured one :> -Mardus (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Upgradeability to Windows 8[edit]

I've removed the section referring to the phone's ability to be upgraded to Windows 8 as it is pure conjecture. There is no reliable source saying either way. A quick web search will reveal a dozen articles saying either way is possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siah1214 (talkcontribs) 15:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC) Siah1214 (talk) 15:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

The paragraph had been properly referenced. Remember that Wikipedia should be a collection of relevant and properly referenced facts. Please avoid WP:NOR. --Enemenemu (talk) 09:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)