Jump to content

Talk:Nord Stage/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    " of Stockholm, Sweden. " perhaps "in ..."?
     Done Changed to Stockholm in Sweden and wikilinked --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Footnotes should be placed behind commas in "Reception" :)
     Done Have done a few of these MOS fixes recently, and of course the last thing I did before the GA review would not have them. Anyway, fixed. :-) --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis () 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail: