Talk:Norske Tog Class 93/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Specific comments

• Need to explain what a "bogie" is in the second paragraph of Specifications.
• I"ve accepted the non-English sources on good faith.

The one explanation needed is not enough to hold this back from GA, so I'll be passing this now. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I have linked to bogie, and put in a short explanation. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)