Talk:Nydalen metro station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

This article, which is for a quite new railway station, is compliant with the requirements. Many of the references are in Norsk, but they appear to verify the claims. I'm therefore awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to do the review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't this be collapsed? __meco (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, but there is no point in doing so, unless there are sections with resolved comments. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Copenhagen Metro stations/archive1 for an example. --Eisfbnore (talk) 19:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]