Talk:O'Doherty's rebellion

Military history: British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal for a change of citation style

Dear wikipedians Cornwallis, Mabuska, Kravtz, or any other interested party that I may have missed. I would like to extend the article but find that the present citation style is too informal and lacks URLs, making it difficult to find the sources and the relevant quotation inside them. This article is rated C and has 24 citations of the style <ref>free text</ref> and a list of sources, also described in free text. I propose to use "short" descriptions in the text ({{Sfn}}) and "long" ones using templates (e.g. {{Cite book}}) in the list of sources like in the recent FA Frederick the Great. Adding URLs would be part of this.

As prescribed in WP:CITEVAR, I formally ask your permission. I hope to obtain a sufficient number of approvals, but if nobody replies within a month, I will assume that I can go ahead without further ado. Given consensus, I would convert the existing citations to the proposed style before any further additions. Respectfully yours Johannes Schade (talk) 15:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no problems, it serves to improve Wikipedia so no complaints here. Mabuska ^(talk) 11:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]