Talk:ObjectVision

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Great source for expansion of this article

See computerworld. Don't have time myself right now. Toddst1 (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

user notes

I was a contract programmer on an IBM-partner banking team using this to prototype (my chosen tool, not a team tool and a very team place with hockey and poker and a final failure both as project and then as corporation.)

I have since left behind the OS/2 machine and only recently left behind the manuals in a attic.

But even as a Smalltalk developer at the time, it had promise, I thought.

In my own work through the mid-nineties I considered my OS/2 Borland C++ environment to be the most useful for compiling large code destined for DOS or Windows ( not OS/2 ! )

It was far more useful than the current IBM Workbench which the VA team turned into Eclipse - a triumph of mediocrity through adoption by those managers who knew no better (the day of the programmer using the best tools and language for the problem are not part of corporate computing - and most graduate programmers do not have a working knowledge of those distantly related languages as exam questions and "projects" do not produce that result.)

G. Robert Shiplett 11:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)