Talk:Oblivion with Bells

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/reviews/album-underworld-396612.html

I've updated the label information for this album. Not sure where the previous info about different / traffic serving as the label came from. Modernliving 17:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Different and Traffic serve as the distribution labels for everywhere outside the U.S. Please try to be a little more globally minded before removing information from articles. Tabanger 20:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should create some wiki entries for those labels since you seem to be so familiar with them. Modernliving 04:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And perhaps you shouldn't delete stuff of which you're not sure? FYI: Different is part of PIAS, and Traffic is a japanese label with artists such as The Orb, UNKLE and Asian Dub Foundation (and of course Underworld). 84.75.109.164 (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Almost unreadable

There has to be a way to make this page (and the other album/single/EP pages) less cluttered and more readable. There is a lot of redundant information that doesn't need mentioning -- Why on earth would anyone read the track listing three times? -- and we need to remember that this is an encyclopedia article, not a discography archive. 72.189.251.198

looks better in its current form, but silly to leave the vinyl formatting on the track listing as the vinyl sold less than a fiftieth of what the CD did upon release in 2007. Tracks 1-11, matching the CD, makes more sense and is also more legible than SIDE A, SIDE B, etc.Dobyblue (talk) 15:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]