Talk:Official Secrets Act 1889

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Moved from Talk: Official Secrets Act

There is another official secrets act prior to the 1911. Interestingly i believe it contained a 'public interest' defence. Official Secrets Act 1889 c. 52 anyone know anything about this act?

The Official Secrets Act, 1889, which was repealed by the 1911 Act, contained provisions penalising the disclosure of official information (section 1) and breach of official trust (section 2). The section 1 offence related to communicating information when "in the interest of the State, it ought not to be communicated". The offence in section 2 related to-

"Where a person, by means of his holding or having held an office under Her Majesty the Queen, has lawfully or unlawfully either obtained possession of or control over any document, sketch, plan, or model, or acquired any information, and at any time corruptly or contrary to his official duty communicates or attempts to communicate that document, sketch, plan, model, or information to any person to whom the same ought not, in the interest of the State, or otherwise in the public interest, to be communicated at that time, he shall be guilty of a breach of official trust."

That reference to the "public interest" may be what you are thinking of. While expressed as an offence of disclosing information that ought not in the public interest be disclosed, it may have given rise to a defence that the disclosure was indeed in the public interest (although the reference to the interest of the State would still be relevant).George Burgess (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]