Talk:Ohio State Route 607/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 17:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Looking at the route description, it doesn't appear that OH 607 goes by that many construction sites. Also, remember construction sites eventually come something once their finished.

In the major intersections table, why is the beginning milepost to two decimal places and the ending milepost to three decimal places?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The lead of the article is awful short. I would look into adding a few more details.

Any idea when Monastery Road/Township Road 209 was initially constructed?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place this article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough 48 72 17:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dough4872: I added more to the lead, and added the 0 for the RJL. I changed the RD just a bit, and I don't there is any information online I could use that has info on when TR 209 was first constructed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 21:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 00:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]