Talk:Ohio State Route 607
Appearance
Ohio State Route 607 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 23, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Ohio State Route 607 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 August 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 607/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 17:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Looking at the route description, it doesn't appear that OH 607 goes by that many construction sites. Also, remember construction sites eventually come something once their finished.
- In the major intersections table, why is the beginning milepost to two decimal places and the ending milepost to three decimal places?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The lead of the article is awful short. I would look into adding a few more details.
- Any idea when Monastery Road/Township Road 209 was initially constructed?
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will place this article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough4872 17:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
@Dough4872: I added more to the lead, and added the 0 for the RJL. I changed the RD just a bit, and I don't there is any information online I could use that has info on when TR 209 was first constructed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 21:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 00:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Mid-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Ohio road transport articles
- Mid-importance Ohio road transport articles
- Ohio road transport articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Ohio articles
- Unknown-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles