Talk:OllyDbg

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

If you pay for the program you can take the source code, see documentation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.58.205.98 (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the article say what CPU(s) it targets? -- Ralph Corderoy (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse Engineering[edit]

The whole section needs a source/citation. In the current state it's just someone's personal beliefs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timonczesq (talk • contribs) 17:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It seems extremely biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.76.169.20 (talk) 22:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the notability notice, as both Eilam & Kaminsky are now added as references. Dj0nes (talk) 17:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Immunity debugger[edit]

does anyone know about the relationship between ollydbg and immunity debugger, which seems to be a fork? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.244.23.60 (talk) 20:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]