Talk:Open-source software assessment methodologies
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]Open source software assessment methodologies → Open-source software assessment methodologies — like Open-source software — Neustradamus (✉) 18:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to Talk:List of free and open source software packages#Requested move. Jafeluv (talk) 16:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of free and open source software packages which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 16:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- That discussion was closed no concensus after 34 days Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Open-source software assessment methodologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071206173446/http://www.osspartner.com:80/portail/sections/accueil-public/evaluation-osmm to http://www.osspartner.com/portail/sections/accueil-public/evaluation-osmm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)