Talk:Open Source Vulnerability Database

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Is this really notable?

I come here as somone who is not familiar with the topic. In other words, I have no idea whether OSVDB is notable or not. What I can tell you is that, if it is, the article does not properly establish that fact. In order to establish that OSVDB is notable, the article needs to reference third party reliable sources (that are independant of the subject) that discuss it. Please fix this problem or the article may end up being deleted. Blueboar (talk) 14:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OSVDB is Notable

OSVDB was the only open source database and collected a significant amount of vulnerabilities not found in CVE/NVD or commercial databases. In many ways, OSVDB provided evolution to vulnerability databases that were stagnant and added no new features since inception. While the project did not work out due to a lack of volunteers and sponsorship, it ran for a significant amount of time and was heavily referenced by other vulnerability databases and organizations around the world.

I have done significant updates to the page to clarify a lot of things about the history and process, as well as adding more names of people involved. I have added some additional citations and will add more in the future. At present, the OSVDB blog is down which provides a lot of reference material. When the blog is restored more updates will be made with the additional citations. Full disclosure: I was involved with the project. That said, I am attempting to include factual material that is cited and remove bias. I am happy to answer questions about the project. --Jericho347 (talk) 03:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]