Talk:Operation Ladbroke/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 06:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First impression

Well-written article. No major issues.

Lead

Good lead – informative, summarises article. No action required.

Background

No action required.

Planing

No action required.

Images, references and external links

Please add alt text to images.

It's not a requirement for GA or even FA

Add years of publication next to author's last name eg. Warren 1955, p. 21.

Done

"London~~, United Kingdom~~: Kimber." no need to mention the UK, as London is well-known. If you insist, shorten it to UK.

Done Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

End note

I find the article very informative and well-written. I find it really hard to find any flaws and mistakes. Very confident this article will be promoted to FA status. I'll be there for the FAC. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 07:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]