Talk:Operation Tunisia

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 October 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Tunisia Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tunisia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Tunisia. For more information, visit the project page.TunisiaWikipedia:WikiProject TunisiaTemplate:WikiProject TunisiaTunisia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

9000

"reportedly over 9000 people participated in the DDoS attacks"

I did indeed laugh out loud. Is this legitimate information> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.186.142 (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The sources said nothing about it so I removed it, I highly doubt it was legitimate. SalfEnergy^u t c 22:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]