Talk:Optic flow

Aren't "optic flow" and "optical flow" synonyms?

They have different entries in Wikipedia but seem similar.

--150.241.250.3 (talk) 09:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This seems true to me. Hell, optical flow says they are... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.58.129 (talk) 06:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, definitely[edit]

This information should definitely be merged into optical flow. Will the author please do this. Dhatfield (talk) 10:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article ( optic flow) is a stub and can be deleted! All necessary information is already present in the other article (optical flow). Dawoodmajoka (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, based on the old proposal and current status, I went ahead and redirected it. If anything got lost, it can picked up from the history. Dicklyon (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]