Talk:Order of Heptasophs/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll review this. Will jot some queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can't end a sentence with ", etc."

Allegedly the ancient King of Persia would select six Magi ... - I'd make it more definitive that it was a story they told, so something like "They reported/recalled/claimed the ancient King of Persia would select six Magi....."

Why is "introduced" in quote marks?

What happens after 1877? Does the organisation die out/grow/what?

Sourcing seems a bit meagre. A cyclopedia is a tertiary source. Surely something more has been written?

Book sources need ISBNs

That's enough to get started. More later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

- first pass found issues still unfixed.

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

- sparse sourcing noted above. Appear to be large gaps in coverage.

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

- seems to be neutral

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- sorry, issues of comprehensiveness and referencing unaddressed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]