Talk:Ossian's Ride
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Restored Henry Farrel's review
[edit]It is significant. Correctly presented as opinion rather than fact. But maybe an opinion that sounds uncomfortably true for some people. GwydionM (talk) 07:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please be advised that after going on this person's profile and clicking some links it becomes clear that this person is a far right, pro ukraine invasion conspiracy theorist. 2A02:C7C:7025:B500:24E4:684F:1A5F:4066 (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Someone is pig-ignorant and sloppy. But since I was told off for insisting that China did not annex Tibet by enforcing its universally accepted sovereign rights, I have given up expecting fairness. Keep your libertarian biases: in the end it will get you replaced by the sort of thing you hate. An official tax-funded alternative.--GwydionM (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
who cares...
[edit].... what this bloke who hides inside a plastic bag thinks of this book?
I hereby question the relevance. there are surely other reviews by people better qualified... if we must have a section about reviews. it's not even that I disagree with his assessment- that's neither here nor there- but he's hardly the TLS, is he?