Talk:Ozy and Millie/GA1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Delisted due to lack of participation. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
My main issue is the quality of the sourcing. As of this writing, the sources are as follows:
1, 3. Interview
2, 4. An unreliable looking fan-zine
5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 15-18, 20-24. The comic itself, or other comics by the artist
7, 12. Forum post
8. Press release
14. A freaking search engine
19, 25. Apparently self-published sources
Furthermore, the "Characters" section has been tagged with {{primary sources}} since 2015.
It's clear that the article has not been maintained in ages. As a webcomic that was also syndicated it's probably notable, but the current level of sourcing is massively below par. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm HenryCrun, one of the participants in WikiProject Webcomics. I agree that this shouldn't be a Good Article, and I don't think it would be easy to bring it up to that level quickly. It was given that status in 2008, when I assume the standards for a Good Article were much lower. As an aside, there are several other webcomic articles with GA status that probably wouldn't make the grade today; all webcomic GA articles are listed on the project's main page. HenryCrun15 (talk) 04:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- @TenPoundHammer: Have the issues been fixed. If not then feel free to delist. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)