Talk:Para-Nordic skiing classification/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 04:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot about this.

There are a couple deadlinks: see here.
- They are archived, but I think they will be back. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prose review will come tomorrow. Couldn't get my head on to do it tonight. Wizardman 05:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my prose concerns:

"The classifications for para-Pordic skiing" para-nordic. Also, the article seems to alternate between para-nordic and para-Nordic; keep it consistent.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"skiing. [1] The" no space after punctuation.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"with LW10 being divided into LW10 and LW10," I feel like something's wrong here.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"International Stoke Mandeville Games Federation (ISMWSF)." Is there a reason the abbreviation and the name don't seem to match up? (You'd think it would be ISMGF; in fact that's the abbr used later on.)
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"ISMWSF In 2003, ISMWSF merged with" rm first ISMWSF
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Scandinavia.[17]The" space after ref
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"During the 1980s, there were 3 sit-ski classes and 7 other classes." three, seven
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"this was defined as 84% for LW10, 93% for LW11 and 100% for LW12." convert the LWs to bluelinks. For some reason they link to LWX, LWXI and LWXII, even though 10-12 now have their own articles.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Their finishing time would then by multiplied" be multiplied.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly nitpicks. I'll put the article on hold and will pass when fixed. Wizardman 23:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All issues addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, so article passes. Wizardman 03:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]