Talk:Parliament (cigarette)

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

(no header)

Is it necessary to have the link to the list of additives in cigarettes in the see also section? It implies a bias, and though it's relevant to the tobacco page or cigarette page, it doesn't contribute anything relevant to a page on a specific brand of cigarettes. Yamahasixstring (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cherokee40 23:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Does anyone know the advantage of the recessed filter on p-funks?[reply]

Parliaments' unique filter recesses are notoriously used for snorting cocaine. One recess fits approximately half a line.

The Recessed Filter

The purpose of the recessed filter is to keep you from getting the end of the ciggerete on your teeth. The idea behind this is to keep your teeth from getting niccotine stains.

That sounds like a good explanation...but do you have a source for it? Postdlf 04:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard this originated from the need tor machinegunners to smoke while at their post, and they must bite the ciggarette in their teeth.

One great thing would have to be when your stoned, the filter is the best for feelin like a hard cock between your fingers!

unsane24's tip of the day:

One great benefit of the recessed filter is when you are on your last cigarette and, after one too many drinks or just bad luck, you flick too hard ashing and break it. Bummer, eh? But no........ Just tear the unsmoked portion off at the end of the filter, twist the unburnt end and insert into the recess on the filter, and smoke away. Voila, you can enjoy the rest of your smoke!

Also, with Parliaments the filter is less likely to break, because the recessed filter is reinforced.

mtskv5's tip: P-Funks are good for all of those cocaine users out there as well.

Unless or until someone actually comes up with a reliable source, I will continue to remove any references to using the recessed filter to snort cocaine that get added to the article. siafu 16:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How are you going to find a reliable source for this? ive seen it many times myself and most parliament smokers know about this, do you smoke parliaments? Cherokee40 17:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was, once upon a time, a pack-a-day smoker of Parliaments and have heard this rumor many times, but I have yet to meet someone who even claimed to have actually used a recessed filter for snorting cocaine. As a result, I see this in the same vein as all the absurd sex practices that get discussed and joked about but never in fact practiced.

Even that aside, it wouldn't be enough to personally know it's possible or true from experience, or to know someone who can vouch for that as neither satisfies WP:V. So we need a reliable source; absent of one, this should be simply omitted, true or not, as wikipedia is not a rumor mill. siafu 20:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: It occurs to me that a reliable source discussing the rumor as a rumor would be enough to merit some sort of inclusion. I don't know of any such source, though. siafu 20:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone, how about to add something information about using the recessed filter to measure and take the dose of amphetamine in Russia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.188.55.33 (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added Template:unsourced to recessed filter section

As a lifelong Parliament smoker, I wish I didn't have to do that... but the recessed filter theories really need sources, and I can't find any. :( All I know is that I love them; they've totally spoiled me for other cigarettes. _{Doc Sigma} ^{(wait, what?)} 13:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation added. If you do a search in the article for "Parliament" you will come across the following lines: "In the same year, 1970, Parliament cigarettes of Philip Morris, Inc (80, 85, and 100 mm length) were tested. The Parliament cigarette was unique in that it had a 5 mm recessed charcoal filter. The novel filter was designed to prevent the tongue from touching the filter face. However, tests revealed that the filter of Parliament cigarettes released carbon particles that ranged in size from 5–120 µm." --Old american century 04:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember a discussion like this between my grandfather and father about the war. The gunners were able to bite down on the filter without ruining it while they were shooting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.190.90.97 (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PARLIAMENT.jpg

Image:PARLIAMENT.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 01:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice the writing upon the navy blue label on the upper side of the pack - it's in Hebrew! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.117.189 (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coke cig

I removed this line from the first paragraph: This has earned them the the title of a "coke cigarette".‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]} Thats a pretty big claim, especially since I know lots of people that smoke P-lights and none of them blow coke with it, so this claim shouldn't be so prominent.

Forbidden in Europe

In this article there was a claim that Parliaments are forbidden in Europe. I find no source or citation for that, so the sentence has been removed. Someone can add it back when he/she finds a reliable source. It is simply implausible that a whole continent forbids a single brand of cigarettes. Wandering Courier (talk) 02:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would explain why I've never seen them on sale anywhere in Europe. It's more than plausible that they have an EU wide ban but I can't find any mention of one via google. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.194.43.139 (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are these cigarette sold as High volume offer in many stores in Tennessee Genesee county michigan

I'm living in Tennessee And they don't offer at any store in Murfreesboro Tennessee 174.235.82.66 (talk) 06:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]