Talk:Pastwatch series

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pastwatch: The Flood

Does this actually exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.107.133 (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon seems to think so. But the ISFDB isn't so sure.

—wwoods 22:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It exist i just checked it out from a public library in america —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.224.29 (talk) 00:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most sites seem to think this is the same book as the Redemption of Chris Columbus, of all the places that mention it this is the only one that explicitly states its a separate book, I hope it is though, the first book was great. 81.109.230.12 (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed Orson Scott Cards website and got a response from his assistant. There is a Pastwatch the flood and it is different from columbus, but it has not been written yet and there is no publication date Lynch2007 (talk) 22:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it will exist. I have added links to two separate articles (one at CNN and one at Card’s own website The Hatrack.) where Card confirms that he will be writing at least two more books in the Pastwatch series. Pmcalduff (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OSCpastwatch.jpg

The image Image:OSCpastwatch.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Pmcalduff (talk) 06:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]