Talk:Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

List of abbreviations

Not sure what Wiki's policy is on this but this article contains a ton of abbreviations, BBB, NAWM, CNS, etc. While many are defined in the text, I was wondering if a "list of abbreviations" is ever a thing. If so, this article could use one to make referencing easier. --167.88.240.10 (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

So much overlap with Pathology of multiple sclerosis Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Pathology of multiple sclerosis is too technical and will be better explained after simplifying and combining with the pathophysiology. PriceDL (talk) 06:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, should be merged. --167.88.240.10 (talk) 23:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is some overlap in the section Pathology of multiple sclerosis#Demyelination process and Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis#MS lesion development, but otherwise the content has a distinctive approach which is reflected in the article titles. The pathology article focusses on classical macroscopic pathology and modern imaging; the pathophysiology article does as the title suggests. The key issue is one of size; both articles are already over 100k each, and even removing duplication won't get the combined article under this size. Therefore, oppose merge on the grounds of WP:TOOBIG and that the current split has some logic to it (although there undoubtably other ways of splitting the content over more than one page). Klbrain (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction image

Hello, the introduction image is not appropriate as it shows a peripheral neuron with schwann cells, which are not affected in MS. Here it should show a neuron with CNS type myelination by oligodendrocytes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SKPapillon (talk • contribs) 19:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]